62g Boeing Flying Fortress, Long range bomber (1939-1949)

More
11 years 7 months ago #3461 by Townie54
I was interested to read in the current Journal of the Dinky 62g Flying Fortress. My uncle was in the crew of one of these and is one of the many on the Runnymede Memorial. I attach a photo and article expanding on Keith Barnard's 'not at all succesfully' use. B17C.pdf www.dtcawebsite.org/images/fbfiles/files/B17C.pdf

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 3 months ago #14274 by janwerner
The Dinky,
prototype
and model: [img] / images / sites / default / files / old - forum - images / dte62g_w_MM39_4_p220 -20140824.jpg [/img] [img] / images / sites / default / files / old - forum - images / dte62g.jpg [/img]

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14450 by Dinkinius
Although not really to do with Dinky Toys, but the following elaborates on my previous post. This is the final resting place for a B-17E belonging to the 19th Bombardment Group on the upper slopes of Mt Obree in the Owen Stanley Ranges of Papua New Guinea, disappeared on 25 April 1942, remained missing for 44 years, and into which I lead a US Army recovery team who recovered all but one crew member over two deployments in 1986 and 1987. The other image is of the author suitably attired 'Rambo Style' following the successful completion of the recovery operation. Bruce

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14535 by Dinkinius
Gentlemen Herewith is my Boeing Flying Fortress 62g together with its box and separate sheet of 'gliding instructions'. Bruce

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14539 by janwerner
Bruce, your posting made me have a closer look at mine for some comparisons. My box appears to be dated two months before yours: November 1939. The leaflet inside seems to be of an older printing, showing 1/838/400, so 1938, in my opinion. The cover shows the same diagram and explanation as yours. I also have another nice example of the Flying Fortress, the new post-war name 'Long Range Bomber' cast under the wing. The film around the roundel with the US star and some other features made me doubt its authenticity. Indeed, one month ago, when John Beugels paid me another visit, he agreed and confirmed that it must definitely be a repaint. Still very nicely done, in fact looking factory-made. Strict as I am in this, it will unfortunately have to leave the collection. Its picture was both included in the 2010 DTCA 75 anniversary Dinky calendar and in the related wallet with post-cards. Kind regards, Jan

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14540 by dinkyfan
Jan and Bruce--Beautiful B-17 Fortresses! So nice to see both of those with the boxes and instructions......it appears that Dinky made quite a good model of it.Terry

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14541 by Dinkinius
janwerner wrote: 'Bruce, your posting made me have a closer look at mine for some comparisons. My box appears to be dated two months before yours: November 1939. The leaflet inside seems to be of an older printing, showing 1/838/400, so 1938, in my opinion. The cover shows the same diagram and explanation as yours. I also have another nice example of the Flying Fortress, the new post-war name 'Long Range Bomber' cast under the wing. The film around the roundel with the US star and some other features made me doubt its authenticity. Indeed, one month ago, when John Beugels paid me another visit, he agreed and confirmed that it must definitely be a repaint. Still very nicely done, in fact looking factory-made. Strict as I am in this, it will unfortunately have to leave the collection. Its picture was both included in the 2010 DTCA 75 anniversary Dinky calendar and in the related wallet with post-cards. Kind regards, Jan' Jan Attached are images of my other 62g with an earlier date of manufacture then yours, June 1939, BW6749 15M 6-39. Also, the printing date on my leaflet in my other 62g is dated March 1940, almost in a time-frame to match the box. You will see that this one is flying backwards! :laugh: The insignia on both wings is reversed. See our previous discussion. There are no profile details on the model with a plan view, nor were there any gliding instructions, although the loose sheet may have become lost over the years. Bruce

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14542 by dinkyfan
Bruce- Lovely boxed example....nice to see these pre-war models in such nice condition.Terry

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14543 by janwerner
Thanks Bruce, that is obviously one of a very early batch! Good to see the alternative lid information format too! Kind regards, Jan

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14611 by john45
Hello friends, There is a nice article on the B 17 I wrote for the Journal Januari 2014. Meanwhile I have found five different datecodes on the boxes. BW 6749 15M 6-39 ( is 15.000 made in June 1939) BW 7295 15M 7-39 BW 9236 15M 11-39 BW 10445 15M 1-40 BW 30M 4-40. The first box only had a description of the plane on the lid. From 7-1939 a diagram of the plane was also printed in the lid. For the first box a special leaflet with diagram was printed and came inside the box. Two different leaflets were printed. First with code 1/6-39/15, 15.000 made June 1939. The second leaflet had no code printed and was probably made as a extra for some later boxes. See the two leaflets below. John.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14614 by john45

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 2 months ago #14615 by john45
First leaflet for B 17 box.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 1.672 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
Cookies user preferences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Analytics
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics
Accept
Decline
Advertisement
If you accept, the ads on the page will be adapted to your preferences.
Google Ad
Accept
Decline
Save